RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlib functionality toavr-libc

[Weddington, Eric]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> address@hidden 
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
> Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 1:33 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlib 
> functionality toavr-libc
> 
> As David Brown wrote:
> 
> > One thing I'd like to suggest is that the "library" be divided into
> > separate areas.  In particular, I'd like to see a "stable" area and
> > a "staging" or "experimental" area.
> 
> I don't mind that, just one remark: unless you got lots of people who
> are eager to test it, there's some risk with that approach that most
> users will never test the "experimental" part until it is finally
> tagged "stable".

Good point. It's probably better just to release early and release often, 
fixing bugs ASAP.