Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlib functionality to avr-libc

[Joerg Wunsch]

As David Brown wrote:

> One thing I'd like to suggest is that the "library" be divided into
> separate areas.  In particular, I'd like to see a "stable" area and
> a "staging" or "experimental" area.

I don't mind that, just one remark: unless you got lots of people who
are eager to test it, there's some risk with that approach that most
users will never test the "experimental" part until it is finally
tagged "stable".

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)