RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names

[Weddington, Eric]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> address@hidden 
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau
> Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 9:12 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug #25300] Additional i/o port names
> 
> 
> Would it be then a good idea to have let says:
> #define OC1A_DDR ....
> #define OC1AN_DDR ...
> 
> "N" as in negative or "I" as in Inverted. I don't like "I" as it can
> be mistaken for a lower case "L".
> 
> Any though on that?

So far I like the "N" version.
 
> As a side note, I had to modify some AVR Studio XML(Some had duplicate
> entries or invalids one) to generate my patch(patch generation is
> pending due to the current issue). Should I include a patch for the
> Atmel XML also?

No, don't bother. Unfortunately those files would not get patched.