avr-libc-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [avr-libc-dev] RE:[avr-gcc-list]noavr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.i


From: Weddington, Eric
Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] RE:[avr-gcc-list]noavr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:15:37 -0700

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> address@hidden 
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 1:49 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] 
> RE:[avr-gcc-list]noavr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in
> 
> As Ruud Vlaming wrote:
> 
> > > > New patch attached.
> > > > begin 666 bootstrap.patch
> > >>  address@hidden(&)O;W1S=')A< H]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]
> > >>  M/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]"E)#4R!F
> > >>  M:6QE.B O<V]U<F-E<R]A=G(M;&EB8R]A=G(M;&EB8R]B;V]T<W1R87 address@hidden
> > 
> > > Without testing, looks fine to me.
> 
> > Wow Joerg, i knew you'r good, but do you have uudecode in your optic
> > nerve?
> 
> Nope. :-)  But it's only been the list server that removed his
> plaintext patch (because it was declared application/octet-stream),
> while I got the original patch because Eric Cc'ed me in his mail.
> 

Uuencoding the attachment is the only way that I can get it to show up on the 
list.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]