[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Add lib per devide.
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Add lib per devide. |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Dec 2008 00:07:09 -0700 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K.
> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 12:02 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Add lib per devide.
>
>
> And... Is it a good design of Avr-gcc, when any addition
> new MCU leads to recompile GCC toolchain (or to install
> the new WinAVR) instead to download io header and to add
> a line into a small configuration file?
I agree with you: The design now is frustrating, and yes, simply adding a line
to configuration file (without recompiling the toolchain) would be much simpler.
Are you volunteering to help implement such a thing? ;-)
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: Add lib per devide., (continued)
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Add lib per devide., Weddington, Eric, 2008/12/21
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Add lib per devide., Anatoly Sokolov, 2008/12/23
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Add lib per devide., Weddington, Eric, 2008/12/23
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Add lib per devide., Anatoly Sokolov, 2008/12/23
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Add lib per devide., Weddington, Eric, 2008/12/23
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Add lib per devide., Dmitry K., 2008/12/24
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Add lib per devide., Anatoly Sokolov, 2008/12/25
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Add lib per devide.,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Add lib per devide., Anatoly Sokolov, 2008/12/25
[avr-libc-dev] 64-bit doubles, Ron Kreymborg, 2008/12/20
RE: [avr-libc-dev] 64-bit doubles, Weddington, Eric, 2008/12/20
RE: [avr-libc-dev] 64-bit doubles, Ron Kreymborg, 2008/12/20
Re: [avr-libc-dev] 64-bit doubles, Preston Wilson, 2008/12/20
Re: [avr-libc-dev] 64-bit doubles, Dave N6NZ, 2008/12/20
Re: [avr-libc-dev] 64-bit doubles, Preston Wilson, 2008/12/20
RE: [avr-libc-dev] 64-bit doubles, Weddington, Eric, 2008/12/20