[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] headers only / bootstrapping an avr toolchain
From: |
Stu Bell |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] headers only / bootstrapping an avr toolchain |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:06:31 -0700 |
The consensus is that Linux users trying to compile the avr toolchain should
avoid crossdev like the plague.
There is a sticky at the top of the AVRfreaks.net GCC forum on compiling the
toolchain for Ubuntu. I recommend following that set of scripts to see if it
solves your problem.
Best regards,
Stu Bell
DataPlay (DPHI, Inc.)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> On Behalf Of Sven Köhler
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 8:14 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [avr-libc-dev] headers only / bootstrapping an avr toolchain
>
> Hi,
>
> at the moment, i'm trying to help the Gentoo developers to
> find a way of bootstrapping an avr toolchain.
>
> Normally Gentoo's tool called "crossdev" would do the following:
> - install binutils-avr
> - install avr-libc-headers
> - install avr-gcc
> - install avr-libc
>
> But the status quo is, that the process fails because of an
> unresolved circular dependency:
>
> - avr-libc needs avr-gcc
> - avr-gcc needs avr-libc headers
>
> I'd need a way, to install avr-libc's headers only. I need to
> bypass all checks for avr-gcc. I dream of doing something like:
>
> - ./configure --headers-only
> - make all
> - make install
>
> But avr-libc's current configure doesn't allow that to
> happen. It always checks for avr-gcc, but of course it
> doesn't find it.
>
>
> Can you think of a way to enhance avr-libc with a "install
> headers-only"
> mode?
>
> If not, how is an avr toolchain supposed to be bootstrapped?
>
>
> Regards,
> Sven
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AVR-libc-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
>