[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[avr-libc-dev] [patch #6500] Reentrant code faq
From: |
Mark Litwack |
Subject: |
[avr-libc-dev] [patch #6500] Reentrant code faq |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:56:20 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080416 Fedora/2.0.0.14-1.fc8 Firefox/2.0.0.14 |
URL:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?6500>
Summary: Reentrant code faq
Project: AVR C Runtime Library
Submitted by: mlitwack
Submitted on: Wednesday 04/30/2008 at 22:56
Category: None
Priority: 5 - Normal
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
_______________________________________________________
Details:
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 08:56:59 -0600
Message-ID:
<address@hidden>
In-Reply-To: <address@hidden>
Thread-Topic: AW: [avr-gcc-list] reentrant interrupt service routine
Thread-Index: AciYu0Kz/U2G9VocRI+0Qcm5/ksRvwAA+KbQ
References:
<address@hidden><address@hidden><address@hidden>
<address@hidden>
From: "Weddington, Eric" <address@hidden>
To: "Mark Litwack" <address@hidden>,
<address@hidden>
Status: R
=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From:=20
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Mark Litwack
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 8:23 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: AW: [avr-gcc-list] reentrant interrupt service routine
>=20
> I don't mean to carry on a conversation with myself, so if
> no one else is interested in reentrant/non-reentrant I'll be
> quiet now, but I would appreciate any other non-reentrant
> issues that people know about. It's hard to find these
> things when they happen.
> =20
Yes, I think other are interested (I'm interested at least), but it's
just that other developers haven't had the time to look into it.
Since you're going through this, what would be extremely helpful is if
you could do these things:
- Create a list of functions that are known re-entrant, and not
re-entrant. This could be put into the avr-libc user manual for other
users. Better to put it in the docs, then left to rot in an email
archive.
- For those functions that are not re-entrant open up a bug report, set
it the Priority (I think it's that field) to "1-Wish". That way it's on
a list to add such re-entrant functions (where possible) at some point,
but at least it's in the system.
Thanks,
Eric Weddington
_______________________________________________________
File Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wednesday 04/30/2008 at 22:56 Name: avr-doc-reentrant.diff Size: 5kB
By: mlitwack
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/download.php?file_id=15568>
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?6500>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [avr-libc-dev] [patch #6500] Reentrant code faq,
Mark Litwack <=