avr-libc-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [avr-libc-dev] Avr-libc test results


From: Weddington, Eric
Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] Avr-libc test results
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:30:04 -0600

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> address@hidden 
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K.
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 9:51 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Avr-libc test results
> 
> On Saturday 15 March 2008 12:53, Weddington, Eric wrote:
> > > Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c at90s2313 ... *** simulate failed: 22
> > > Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c at90s4414 ... *** simulate failed: 22
> > > Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c at90s8515 ... *** simulate failed: 22
> > > Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c atmega8 ... *** simulate failed: 22
> > > Simulate: avr/eeprom-1.c atmega16 ... *** simulate failed: 22
> > >    It is strange...  The 22 line is the first EEPROM read
> > > operation.  Now I try to build and test CVS HEAD 2008-03-09... OK.
> > > Later I will update and try once more.
> > >
> > > Eric, please, mail what compiler version are you use?
> > > And version of simulavr.
> >
> > Binutils 2.18
> > GCC 4.3.0
> > Avr-libc latest from 1.6 branch
> > Simulavr 0.1.2.3
> 
> Oh, I see that Simulavr is live!

Not really. Joerg just has some minor patches that he finally got
committed. This will probably be the last version of the simulavr code
base, unless something is seriously broken.

> simulavr-0.1.2.3/src/avrcore.c avr_core_new()
> differs from 0.1.2.1:
>    ...
>    core->eeprom = NULL;
>    ...
> 
> Is it a reason of test fault?
> 

Honestly I don't know. I'm not that familiar with the internals.

Dmitry, do you think that the avr-libc test suite can be run with the
new "avrtest" program that is in the WinAVR repository?




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]