RE: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library

[Weddington, Eric]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> address@hidden 
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:42 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library
> 
> As Weddington, Eric wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for the reminder; you're right it's GPL+exception. Then I
> > would be OK with a library having such a license.
> 
> I find it quite complicated, compared to the plain old BSD-style
> license we've been using for avr-libc for years now.  Is there any
> specific reason you want it, are you unhappy that anyone could get
> along with changing it but not feeding back his changes?
> 

No, as I mentioned before, I'm ok with either BSD or GPL+exception.
Personally I have no preference between the two. I just want to make
sure that:
1. the license is easy to understand (or the ramifications are easy to
understand)
2. the code can be used in a commercial device without having to divulge
the proprietary parts.