[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:59:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
As Rich Teer wrote:
> There's another (I'd argue, better) alternative: the CDDL.
> Certianly worth evaluating...
Can you elaborate on "better"?
My first impression for a couple of reasons why I don't really like
it:
. yet another license model (we've had quite a hard time in the past
to move everything into one license statement)
. artificially incompatible with GPL (I'm not really fond of the GPL
but don't see a reason to emit code that is incompatible with it)
. much more license text to worry about than the relatively simple
BSD license
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library, David Brown, 2008/01/03
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library, Weddington, Eric, 2008/01/03
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library, Joerg Wunsch, 2008/01/03
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library, Weddington, Eric, 2008/01/03
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library, Joerg Wunsch, 2008/01/03
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library, Weddington, Eric, 2008/01/03
Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library, David Brown, 2008/01/04