[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[avr-libc-dev] What about to make 'reti' as a default behaviour?
|
From: |
Dmitry K. |
|
Subject: |
[avr-libc-dev] What about to make 'reti' as a default behaviour? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:09:21 +1000 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
Hi.
Now in case of unforeseen interrupt the program is
jumped to zero address. As a rule, such behaviour
is bad, as it leads to restart program without
restarting a MCU's hardware.
What about to perform 'reti' in case if the user
does not define own __vector_default ?
Dmitry.
- [avr-libc-dev] What about to make 'reti' as a default behaviour?,
Dmitry K. <=
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] What about to make 'reti' as a default behaviour?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/12/16
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] What about to make 'reti' as a default behaviour?, Marek Michalkiewicz, 2007/12/16
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] What about to make 'reti' as a default behaviour?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/12/16
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] What about to make 'reti' as a default behaviour?, Dmitry K., 2007/12/17
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] What about to make 'reti' as a default behaviour?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/12/18
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] What about to make 'reti' as a default behaviour?, Joerg Wunsch, 2007/12/18
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] What about to make 'reti' as a default behaviour?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/12/18
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] What about to make 'reti' as a default behaviour?, Joerg Wunsch, 2007/12/18
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] What about to make 'reti' as a default behaviour?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/12/18
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] What about to make 'reti' as a default behaviour?, Joerg Wunsch, 2007/12/18