[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release?
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release? |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:01:52 -0700 |
> > Simultaneously quality of a code concedes not only to
> > branches 3.3 and 3.4, but even concedes to a branch 4.1.
> > For example, Avr-libc's sscanf("1.2345","%e",&x) takes
> > 3886 bytes of flash and 140 bytes of stack with 4.2.2.
> > Above branch (4.1.2) uses only 3802 bytes of flash and
> > 128 bytes of stack.
> >
>
> This is a much more important issue. I haven't tested 4.2
> for the avr,
> or done serious comparisons with older versions. Is there anything
> specific behind this problem?
>
It's a bit late to be discussing these issues, or reworded: I wish that
discussions like this were done a lot earlier.
I'm planning on release WinAVR with GCC 4.2.2. The most major issue that
I see right now is GCC bug #29524
<http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29524>
I would like to see a patch for this (even if it is not perfect but
works) sometime next week.
Eric
- [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/11/26
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Dmitry K., 2007/11/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Joerg Wunsch, 2007/11/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Anatoly Sokolov, 2007/11/28
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/11/28
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Dmitry K., 2007/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Wouter van Gulik, 2007/11/29
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Wouter van Gulik, 2007/11/29
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/11/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Dmitry K., 2007/11/30
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] New release?, Weddington, Eric, 2007/11/30