[avr-libc-dev] Postscript documentation still needed?

[Joerg Wunsch]

We've been shipping documentation as HTML, Postscript, and PDF for
quite some years now.  As compiling the intermediate LaTeX code into
PS and PDF requires different settings, this causes two runs of
doxygen to build the documentation.

I wonder whether people do actually value the PS version at all, or if
we could simply drop it from the build as anyone who wants a printed
manual could always print the PDF version instead (which gives a
similarly high-quality print as PS does).

Opinions?
-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)