RE: [avr-libc-dev] License for .dox files

[Eric Weddington]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joerg Wunsch [mailto:address@hidden 
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 2:18 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Cc: Eric Weddington
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] License for .dox files
> 
> As Eric Weddington wrote:
> 
> > I'm going through the .dox files in the doc/api directory. Why do
> > these files have a 2-clause BSD license instead of the 3-clause
> > license used for the source code?
> 
> Good question, perhaps because Ted once created them that way?
> 
> It shouldn't matter too much, as these files will never be linked into
> customer's applications, but from a consistency point of view, it
> doesn't make much sense either to have them under a different license
> than the actual code.

Any objections, or problems in changing them to the 3-clause license, to be
consistent?