[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] OPTIMIZE_SPEED for avr5?
From: |
Eric Weddington |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] OPTIMIZE_SPEED for avr5? |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:57:13 -0700 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K.
> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 10:38 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [avr-libc-dev] OPTIMIZE_SPEED for avr5?
>
> Hi.
>
> Today, there is a bit of functions (memset, memcpy and
> memcpy_P), which are in 2 variants: compact and speed.
> This acceleration is very effective: a few of progmem
> words give 10..30% speed increase. I plan to expand this
> function list slightly.
>
> Avr-libc compiles a speed variant for avr3 family only.
> What about to add avr5? Is there any objections?
Hi Dmitry,
This brings up the overall issue of what should the goal be for avr-libc?
Speed, or size?
I still lean towards *size* as the number 1 priority for all code, for all
architectures and devices. When AVR compilers are compared, they are always
compared on code size, not code speed.
Eric Weddington
- [avr-libc-dev] OPTIMIZE_SPEED for avr5?, Dmitry K., 2007/03/02
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] OPTIMIZE_SPEED for avr5?,
Eric Weddington <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] OPTIMIZE_SPEED for avr5?, Dmitry K., 2007/03/03
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] OPTIMIZE_SPEED for avr5?, David Brown, 2007/03/06
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] OPTIMIZE_SPEED for avr5?, Bob Paddock, 2007/03/06
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] OPTIMIZE_SPEED for avr5?, Joerg Wunsch, 2007/03/06
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] OPTIMIZE_SPEED for avr5?, Eric Weddington, 2007/03/06
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] OPTIMIZE_SPEED for avr5?, David Brown, 2007/03/08
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] OPTIMIZE_SPEED for avr5?, Ned Konz, 2007/03/06
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] OPTIMIZE_SPEED for avr5?, Eric Weddington, 2007/03/06
- Message not available
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] OPTIMIZE_SPEED for avr5?, Joerg Wunsch, 2007/03/07
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] OPTIMIZE_SPEED for avr5?, Curtis Maloney, 2007/03/06