[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Better Interrupt Macro
From: |
Eric Weddington |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Better Interrupt Macro |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Dec 2006 14:20:17 -0700 |
Hi Dean,
Yes, attachments are allowed. Yes, it is always better to put things in a
Tracker (Bug, Patch, etc.) on the avr-libc Savannah website, as emails tend
to get lost. If it's in a Tracker, then we always review them when it comes
time to do a new release.
Thanks
Eric Weddington
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Dean
> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 4:04 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Better Interrupt Macro
>
> I've finished converting my "better" ISR macro over to the
> style used in AVRLibC. I added in one or two extra things
> from last time, and added in the sei(), cli(),
> EMPTY_INTERRUPT and deprecated SIGNAL macros/functions from
> the old interrupt.h file.
>
> I added in new DoxyGen comments, however as I have no idea
> how to get DoxyGen to run, I can't test this. If someone
> would be so kind as to do so, I'd appreciate it as I'm only
> guessing on the correct syntax to use by looking at other
> AVRLibC header files.
>
> I don't know if attachments are allowed, so I'll upload it to
> my private webserver:
> http://home.pacific.net.au/~sthelena/General/interrupt_new.h
>
> What is the appropriate channel to use to get this into the
> next AVRLibC? Do I submit it as a new patch?
>
> Cheers all,
> - Dean
> _______________________________________________
> AVR-libc-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
>