avr-libc-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [avr-libc-dev] AVR toolchain patch hell


From: Eric Weddington
Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] AVR toolchain patch hell
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 08:45:56 -0600

Hi Scott, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott L. Price [mailto:address@hidden 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 7:08 PM
> To: Eric Weddington
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] AVR toolchain patch hell
> 
> 
> 
> Eric Weddington wrote:
> > Hello All,
> > 
> 
> ...SNIP...
> 
> > - Can we figure out some level of coordination between all 
> the various
> > distros as to what should be the patch list for a 
> particular release?
> I was the originator of the toolchain and avr-libc build scripts for
> Gentoo.  Avr-libc is now put in by someone who is a lot faster at
> getting them put into the portage tree (I am not a Gentoo developer).
> The AVR toolchain target is created using a script that will 
> build cross
> compilers for many different arches.  I think that patches 
> would have to
> go into the base GCC script and there are already a lot of 
> patches that
> are put into it.  That might be why the AVR stuff has not been added.

Can you explain this a bit more?
You say there are already a lot of patches put into the base GCC script. Are
these patches specific to other targets? Are you saying that *none* of the
avr target specific patches are put into the Gentoo distribution of avr-gcc?

 
> > - Can we get more volunteers? To help with either testing 
> unconfirmed bug
> > reports, coding patches, testing patches, etc.
> Okay.  How should I start?  Should I just find unconfirmed 
> bugs and try
> to confirm them and document them better?  I can try to find/fix them
> and submit patches.

That would be a fantastic start! :-) Even if you could just confirm the
bugs.

On the avr-libc website, there is now a list of all bugs for the AVR
toolchain:
<http://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/bugs.html>
The list of GCC bugs marks which ones are *UNCONFIRMED*.

Specifically, these two need to be confirmed:
<http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26882>
<http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27192>

Thanks
Eric






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]