[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-libc-dev] RE: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with ba

From: Joerg Wunsch
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] RE: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:41:00 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/

As Bjarne Laursen wrote:

> Agree, why not also get the radix out of the parameter list and into
> the function name like:

> char * itoa_2(int /value/, char */string/);

> char * itoa_16(int /value/, char */string/);

Doesn't make sense as these functions are all the same.

cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]