[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base !

From: Rolf Ebert
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:03:44 +0100
User-agent: Opera M2/8.50 (Win32, build 7700)

The only drawback of that approach is that its use will restrict the
posible base of these functions to either 2, 8, 10, or 16.


I am in favor of a fast and restricted itoa as the default. Even more so if you still provide the full implementation by a simple compile time switch.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]