[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-libc and atmega324

From: Alexei Chetroi
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-libc and atmega324
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:05:26 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 09:47:41PM +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:47:41 +0100
> From: Joerg Wunsch <address@hidden>
> Reply-To: Joerg Wunsch <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-libc and atmega324
> > Does anybody else on this list knows the differences between
> > gcc-3.4.4 and gcc-3.4.3
> ISTR at least one major ``pessimisation'' issue has been fixed that
> affects the AVR target.
> > or between binutils 2.15 and 2.16 regarding the avr port?
> See above.

  Thanks for the information. I've managed to build debian packages of
binutils-2.16 and avr-gcc-3.4.4 and noticed that debian packages also
includes patch for the mega325 and mega3250 devices which are not
available from the http://www.kieltech.de/~ufechner/patch-2005-04.zip
I've used gcc-core-3.4.4 and gcc-g++-3.4.4 from the gnu mirror, because
 full gcc tarball didn't produced avr-g++ command for my debian package,
don't know why. With gcc-core and gcc-g++ everything works fine. Now I'm
in process of building avr-libc debian package.

  Best wishes

Alexei Chetroi

Smile... Tomorrow will be worse. (c) Murphy's Law

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]