Re: [avr-libc-dev] Automated testing project

[Paul Schlie]

Personally I'm sure this had nothing to do with Ted's decision to give avr
tool development a rest in general, nor likely even his opinion.

> From: Joerg Wunsch <address@hidden>
> Yes, perhaps.  Simulavr is well structured, but often already ``too
> well'', i.e. it became quite inefficient that way.  But I think the
> main reason why Ted realized it was going to become a dead-end street