[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[avr-libc-dev] Suggested ISR function

From: James A.R. Koehler
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Suggested ISR function
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 16:19:00 +0000

        I'd vote for depreciating both SIGNAL and INTERRUPT in favour of ISR.
Indeed, I'd go further and suggest that it intrinsically be the given
the attribute of '__naked__' as, for the life of me, I can't see why it
is useful to have r0 and r1 set every time an interrupt occurs.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]