Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] RFD: more avr-libc API changes

[Zane D. Purvis]

Joerg Wunsch wrote:

> As Matthew MacClary wrote:
>
> (About whether to keep <avr/interrupt.h> or <avr/signal.h> after
> merging their contents.)
>
>  
>
> >    My suggestion would be to change INTERRUPT to be the same as
> > SIGNAL, and then deprecate SIGNAL.
> >    
How about changing the name to "ISR," which would do the same thing as 
the existing "SIGNAL"?


#include <avr/isr.h>

ISR( SIG_ADC ) {
   // interrupt service routine code here
}


Then, SIGNAL and INTERRUPT can both be deprecated (avoiding future 
confusion).



            --  Zane