[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11505] inp()/outp() comments in ./include/avr/sfr_

From: Eric Weddington
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11505] inp()/outp() comments in ./include/avr/sfr_defs.h outdated
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:59:34 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041001 Firefox/0.10.1

This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
 of the project: AVR C Runtime Library.

[bugs #11505] Latest Modifications:

Changes by: 
                Eric Weddington <address@hidden>
                Fri 01/07/2005 at 19:47 (America/Denver)

------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
[(Error - Not Found)]
Fixed on 1.2 branch. Bug closed.

[bugs #11505] Full Item Snapshot:

URL: <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=11505>
Project: AVR C Runtime Library
Submitted by: Mudiaga Obada
On: Wed 01/05/2005 at 21:41

Category:  Documentation
Severity:  5 - Average
Priority:  5 - Normal
Item Group:  None
Resolution:  None
Privacy:  Public
Percent Complete:  None
Assigned to:  arcanum
Originator Email:  address@hidden
Status:  Closed

Summary:  inp()/outp() comments in ./include/avr/sfr_defs.h outdated

Original Submission:  It seems like the documentation in 
./include/avr/sfr_defs.h was left in there after inX()/outX() support was 

The following should be removed:

   The old inp()/outp() macros are still supported, but not recommended to use
   in new code.  The order of outp() arguments is confusing. </quote>

Also the lines

        out     _SFR_IO_ADDR(SPMCR), r24
        sts     _SFR_MEM_ADDR(SPMCR), r24

look stray, since i can't tell from their (stand alone) context what they are 
there for. Also, the comments that follow it looks strage to me...

For my oppinion (which i know comes rather late), no longer having inX()/outX() 
and cbi()/sbi() support is unfortunate. There's lot of existing code that uses 
it, and it can be really inconvinient - especially for those new to 

Follow-up Comments

Date: Fri 01/07/2005 at 19:47       By: Eric Weddington <arcanum>
Fixed on 1.2 branch. Bug closed.

Date: Fri 01/07/2005 at 19:26       By: Eric Weddington <arcanum>
Fixed on 1.2 branch. Bug closed.

Date: Fri 01/07/2005 at 19:04       By: Eric Weddington <arcanum>
Fixed on HEAD. Will fix on 1.2 branch....

Date: Wed 01/05/2005 at 21:54       By: Mudiaga Obada <obada>
Ok, i see what 

out _SFR_IO_ADDR(SPMCR), r24

has to do with __SFR_OFFSET. Please ignore that part of the previous message.

For detailed info, follow this link:

  Message sent via/by Savannah

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]