Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf

[E. Weddington]

Joerg Wunsch wrote:

> As E. Weddington wrote:
>
>  
>
> > Makes sense. I'm also going to have to go through the IO headers
> > with a comb now and fix up the problems I created (a la bug
> > #11486). This might mean a 1.2.1 release. Sorry for the hassle.
> >    
>
> No problem at all.  I think it's a lot better to roll yet another
> release within a month or so, than to push the next release date
> forever since this and that and that one and ... still need to be done
> before releasing something new.
>
>  
Agreed. Release early, release often.

> > My goal is to see what it would take to *just* get the autotool
> > upgrade working, and doing the lib/device thing later.
> >    
>
> OK, fine with me.  I'm the last one to mourn if we don't need
> ancient tools anymore. ;-)
>
>  

Out of curiosity, which versions of the autotools are you using?