Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Licensing information

[E. Weddington]

Joerg Wunsch wrote:

> As E. Weddington wrote:
>
>  
>
> > Now to the big problem: The original license file said that avr-libc was 
> > a Modified BSD License (with the No Advertising clause). However the 
> > "template" that it gave for new authors, only showed the original two 
> > clauses of the BSD license.
> >    
>
>
> For those files where I hold the copyright, I don't mind whether it's
> the 2-clause or 3-clause version.  I agree we should settle for one of
> both, and see to convert the remaining files (given author's
> permission).

So, Ted. What's your opinion. 2-clause? or 3-clause?

Thanks
Eric