Re: [avr-libc-dev] New device header files.

[E. Weddington]

Joerg Wunsch wrote:

> As E. Weddington wrote:
>
>  
>
> > I just committed 5 new device header files on mainline. Question: Should 
> > these also be committed to the 1.0 branch as well?
> >    
>
> IMHO not until there's a released version of the compiler and binutils
> that supports these processors.  If that happens, we could quickly
> roll a matching avr-libc release then.
>
> Perhaps it's also time to think about what would be required before
> we roll out avr-libc-1.2?
>  
Funny you should mention that... I was just looking at the TODO file. It 
lists the things that we once thought of doing before 1.2. I don't know 
how everyone (especially Ted) feels about it, but upgrading to using the 
latest autotools I think should make the list.

We should also see about getting the new devices (the patches that we 
have) into binutils/gcc.

Ted mentioned that Marek had an idea about moving to per device libs. 
Perhaps we could ping him about it.

Thanks Jörg for the advice about the header files. I'll go close the 
patch trackers.

Eric