|
From: | E. Weddington |
Subject: | Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bugs #10329] crtm168.o is not being built |
Date: | Thu, 07 Oct 2004 11:17:46 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) |
Keith Gudger wrote:
I've been seing some of that here. I haven't yet mentioned it on the avr-libc list.Ted & Eric: I followed this thread because of a problem I found with avr-libc-1.0.4. Hopefully you can tell me I'm all wet, but here's what happened: I got the avr-libc-1.0.4 tar, and built it. Afterwords, the avr3, avr4, and avr5 directories were no longer in my /usr/avr/lib directory, meaning all of those devices were no longer supported. My version of avr-gcc is:
I have a "avr-libc/avr-libc-1.0.4" dir which contains the source. I build in the "avr-libc/build" dir. The building process then creates:
avr-libc/avr3 avr-libc/avr4 avr-libc/avr5that are parallel to the /build directory. I would have expected these directories to be under /build.
But the good thing is that everything seems to build and install just fine for me. This is one reason why I haven't mentioned this yet. But, I could be the oddball here since I build on Cygwin. :-)
Those versions are probably ok, but you might want to upgrade to a *released* version of gcc, perhaps 3.3.2, and go to binutils 2.15. IMHO, I would avoid using the 3.4.x series for the AVR target for the time being due to regression bugs. Unless you like patching. :-)avr-gcc (GCC) 3.3 20030428 (prerelease), which with binutils 2.13 should be OK, no? Thanks.
Eric
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |