|
From: | Svein E. Seldal |
Subject: | Re: [avr-libc-dev] being able to use libc without fdevopen? |
Date: | Wed, 08 Sep 2004 10:37:50 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040830) |
Bernard Fouché wrote:
Hi. I'm using an atmega162 and being short on flash. So I removed fdevopen because I use only printf/puts, etc, with no float. fdevopen bring in calloc/malloc and that eats more than one K of flash + ram overhead for dynamic allocation. I was not able to link without the official fdevopen, maybe I misunderstood linker options like "-Wl,-u,fdevopen". To get rid of calloc/malloc in my application, I had to get rid of fdevopen and to do so include stdio_private.h in my code and regenerate a libc without fdevopen. Is there another way to do it (I'd like to keep using the libc the 'official' way) ?
I have been annoied by the same fact. In fact I do not want to use the official avr-libc printf because it eats too much resources. After a brief investigation it turns out to be the addition of the fdevopen, which in turn pulls in calloc. Since I'm using a very small AVR, I absolutely do not want to use calloc. Hence avr-libc printf was dropped.
The reason that is so cumbersome today is basically because the developers dont want to reveal the size of FILE/struct __file. They have a avr-libc build-time implementation which is hidden from the user. E.g. to take sizeof(FILE) in an application is impossible because struct __file has no implementation in stdio.h. When you call fdevopen you will be returned a pointer to a memoryarea (of unknown size) to a struct __file. This unknown size is the size of the FILE implementation in the internal parts of the libc library.
While the idea to do this hiding of FILE's implementation is good, I dont like it when being used on a small microcontroller, because it requires calloc/malloc to work.
So my request is basically the same as Bernards request: Can we please make a static implementation of FILE, so that we dont need to have calloc to make it work. Or to put it in another way: I dont want to implement calloc _only_ because printf requires it.
I have an outline to fix this. It might not be the best solution, but it can possibly help to find a working version that does not require calloc.
in stdio.h: #define FILE_SIZEOF 8 typedef uint8_t FILE[FILE_SIZEOF]; in stdio_private.h: struct __file { ... } in fdevopen.c: FILE *fdevopen_static(FILE *file, int (*put)(char), int (*get)(void), int opts __attribute__((unused)))
{ struct __file *s = (struct __file *)file; } in app.c: int main(void) { FILE static_file; fdevopen_static(&file,my_putc,my_getc,0); } The first assumption is that FILE is not defined to be struct __file.The biggest challenge here is to keep sizeof(struct __file) == sizof(FILE) in sync. Maybe the FILE_SIZEOF could be autogenererated when the struct __file is compiled in the libc function?
Svein
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |