Re: [avr-libc-dev] C++ compile-time FSM generator?

[Bob Cook]

Hi,

I spent some time a couple of months back looking at the state of C++. 
The avr-libc documentation includes the high-level version of the 
existing limitations. The lack of a Standard C++ Library is sort of a 
showstopper for using boost. Minimalist C++ works fine, including 
ctor/dtor, virtual methods (but not pure virtual methods) and 
inheritance, templates, etc. But no containers, no iostream, etc. I 
made an attempt at getting the gcc C++ libraries to compile but I 
didn't have the time or the knowledge to understand the complexities. 
It seems feasible to duplicate enough of the gcc libsupc++ to get 
new/delete and pure virtual functions working, but I decided my 
projects (hobby robotics) could live without those features.

Regards,
Bob Cook

On 29-May-04, at 3:23 AM, Bob Paddock wrote:

> > As written the PSTR macro doesn't work when used in C++ modules.
>
> Is enought of the AVR C++ functioning that it could do this?: