[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] [PATCH] printf: %s arguments with precision
|
From: |
Christopher Hoover |
|
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] [PATCH] printf: %s arguments with precision |
|
Date: |
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 10:59:50 -0800 |
though, in particular in the PRINTF_MIN case.
> I would prefer a version that doesn't call strlen()/strnlen()
> though, in particular in the PRINTF_MIN case.
I can do that, but can you explain why that is preferred?
(If it is a code size issue, can we arrange instead to have strlen/strnlen
(or a version thereof) inlined?)
-ch
Re: [avr-libc-dev] [PATCH] printf: %s arguments with precision, Joerg Wunsch, 2004/02/02