[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions.
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions. |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:28:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
As Theodore A. Roth wrote:
> A similar problem has been noted for printf() and printf_P() in bug
> #6141.
>
> It looks like we need to add quite a few sanity checks. :-(
I'm not sure whether we do want sanity checks at all. After all, this
is all pilot errors (people forgetting to check whether their buffers
or FILE * are NULL), but by adding sanity checks, a penalty will be
imposed on anyone using these functions, including those who used it
correctly.
Unfortunately, I didn't find any conclusion in the C standard whether
the behaviour in these situations might be implementation-defined or
undefined. Maybe ask in comp.lang.c?
--
J"org Wunsch Unix support engineer
address@hidden http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/
- [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions., Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/18
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions., Mike Panetta, 2003/11/18
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions., Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions.,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions., E. Weddington, 2003/11/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions., Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions., Joerg Wunsch, 2003/11/20
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Joerg's new vsprint functions., Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/20