[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[avr-libc-dev] [bug #5799] error(?) in iom162.h
From: |
nobody |
Subject: |
[avr-libc-dev] [bug #5799] error(?) in iom162.h |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Oct 2003 16:12:31 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020623 Debian/1.0.0-0.woody.1 |
=================== BUG #5799: LATEST MODIFICATIONS ==================
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=5799&group_id=2140
Changes by: Theodore A. Roth <address@hidden>
Date: Fri 10/17/03 at 13:12 (US/Pacific)
What | Removed | Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution | None | Fixed
Status | Open | Closed
------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
I've this on HEAD and 1.0 branch.
The PORTxn changes are really a separate issue and are being handled.
=================== BUG #5799: FULL BUG SNAPSHOT ===================
Submitted by: None Project: AVR C Runtime Library
Submitted on: Tue 10/07/03 at 23:58
Category: Header Severity: 5 - Major
Bug Group: None Resolution: Fixed
Assigned to: troth Originator Email: address@hidden
Status: Closed
Summary: error(?) in iom162.h
Original Submission: In definitions for UCSR0A: bit 2 is defined as PE0, this
should be UPE0. In definitions for UCSR1A: bit 2 is defined as PE1, this should
be UPE1. This according to datasheet for Atmega162(V) rev: 2513E-AVR-09/03
I guess this is the reson why PORTE bits are defined as PORTE0, PORTE1....
instead of PE0, PE1.. as would be normal.
I am usign WinAVR-20030913
Follow-up Comments
*******************
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri 10/17/03 at 13:12 By: troth
I've this on HEAD and 1.0 branch.
The PORTxn changes are really a separate issue and are being handled.
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri 10/17/03 at 10:49 By: troth
The 09/02 version of the datasheet still has UPEn. I see no mention of PEn in
the UCSRnA register summary. I'm going to simply replace PEn with UPEn instead
of adding UPEn and making PEn an alias.
Now the PORTE part brings up another issue. The usage is not consistant in this
header file. All other port pins are defined like PAn while PORTE is PORTEn.
The datasheet register summary shows them all as PORTxn. I'd prefer to just
have all the headers use Pxn regardless of what the datasheets say, but that
doesn't seem to be the concensus of the developers.
CC list is empty
No files currently attached
For detailed info, follow this link:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=5799&group_id=2140
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
[avr-libc-dev] [bug #5799] error(?) in iom162.h,
nobody <=