Re: [avr-libc-dev] volatile in pgmspace.h ?

[E. Weddington]

> On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:16:17PM +0000, E. Weddington 
wrote:
> > As the macros "return" the byte being read from flash, 
the 
> > only way I see to do this would be another parameter 
which 
> > would hold a pointer to their address. I don't think 
this 
> > would buy the user any advantage then.
> 
> We have macros here, not functions.  So, you can return 
the new
> pointer value in the same macro argument, by using a 
simple C
> assignment - no pointers.  Of course, this should only be 
done
> in the _next macros, not in the normal ones.
> 
> Marek

Unfortunately, that would assume that the argument to the 
macro would be a variable. If the argument is a constant, 
it wouldn't work.

Eric