avr-libc-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[avr-libc-dev] [Bug #2958] Error in iom16.h


From: nobody
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] [Bug #2958] Error in iom16.h
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 15:38:45 -0400

=================== BUG #2958: LATEST MODIFICATIONS ==================
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=2958&group_id=2140

Changes by: Joerg Wunsch <address@hidden>
Date: Fri 04/11/03 at 21:38 (Europe/Berlin)

            What     | Removed                   | Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Resolution | None                      | Invalid
              Status | Open                      | Closed


------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
ADATE is the correct naming for the ATmega16, according to
Atmel's datasheet.  Naming this bit ADFR would even risk the
danger of blindly assuming that the ATmega16 had a free-running
mode for its ADC which it actually doesn't have.

The original submitter never responded to this when it was
brought up in the avr-libc-devel mailing list.



=================== BUG #2958: FULL BUG SNAPSHOT ===================


Submitted by: jf_richard69            Project: AVR C Runtime Library        
Submitted on: Thu 03/27/03 at 16:41
Category:  Header                     Severity:  5 - Major                  
Bug Group:  None                      Resolution:  Invalid                  
Assigned to:  joerg_wunsch            Originator Email:  address@hidden
Status:  Closed                       

Summary:  Error in iom16.h

Original Submission:  The byte number 5 of ADCSR is named ADATE in the file 
iom16.h at line 513 but it should be ADFR like in all the other io include file 
of the avr that support the adc.

Follow-up Comments
*******************

-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri 04/11/03 at 21:38         By: joerg_wunsch
ADATE is the correct naming for the ATmega16, according to
Atmel's datasheet.  Naming this bit ADFR would even risk the
danger of blindly assuming that the ATmega16 had a free-running
mode for its ADC which it actually doesn't have.

The original submitter never responded to this when it was
brought up in the avr-libc-devel mailing list.


CC list is empty


No files currently attached


For detailed info, follow this link:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=2958&group_id=2140




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]