Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc-3.3 branch

[Joerg Wunsch]

As Marek Michalkiewicz wrote:

> > Hmm.  Would it make sense to generally use the less efficient form,
> > and then leave it to the optimizer to reorder the registers?
> > [volatile...]

> Hmm, looks like a good idea - it seems out_movhi_mr_r could check
> for "volatile" ("mem/v" in RTL dumps) with MEM_VOLATILE_P (dest).
> Right now (again, sorry it's so late...), I'd rather not change
> anything in the 3.3 branch, better test this in mainline first.

OK, then let's do it that way.  Do you want me to file a bug report
with gcc, or do you have a personal TODO list where you would keep
this?
-- 
J"org Wunsch                                           Unix support engineer
address@hidden        http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/