Re: [avr-libc-dev] Program memory macros and -mint8

[Joerg Wunsch]

As E. Weddington wrote:

> If having -mint8 compatibility is a future goal, at least what about 
> defining the method of doing first, like getting <inttypes.h> fixed 
> per Joerg, and then have a policy of any new code added be -mint8 
> compatible. Then, the current code can be fixed up over time.

I wouldn't see -mint8 compatibility as a major goal, but that doesn't
prevent us from becoming more careful with future code to be cleaner
in that respect.  But i can only repeat this: it needs a volunteer.
I. e., if new code enters the tree, someone must really go there,
and audit that code to see whether it is -mint8 clean, can be made
-mint8 clean, or just needs to be documented to nevre work with
-mint8.
-- 
J"org Wunsch                                           Unix support engineer
address@hidden        http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/