[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Release philosofy questions
From: |
Lorne Gutz |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Release philosofy questions |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:44:45 -0400 |
I have been using gcc3.2 with binutil 2.13 for some time with
avr-libc 20020203. A couple of weeks ago I started work on
an ATmega8. Well there was no startup code in 20020203
so I just installed avr-libc 20020630 right over top to get the
proper startup file and everything has worked.
Are there any known bugs that I should look out for with this
combination? If I find any I will post them here, and I plan
to upgrade gcc to 3.3 when a stable version is released.
thanks
Lorne
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 15:10, Olof Tångrot wrote:
> Hi maintainers of avr-libc.
> The latest release of avr-libc is dated 2002-02-03. That was months before
> the release date of release 3.2 of gcc which was released in august. Now
> the current snapshot requires gcc 3.3 to build and possibly a new snapshot
> of binutils as well. Since fixing the faults i gcc snapshots is far beyond
> my capacity I would befit more from a libc developed for a released
> compiler. I guess that so would most a the potetial users of libc. What is
> the catch of development of libc with a stable version of the compiler? How
> shall idiots like me know what release of avr-libc is compatible with
> released compiler xxx?
>
> Olof
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Release philosofy questions,
Lorne Gutz <=