Re: [avr-libc-dev] dox status and next release

[Theodore A. Roth]

On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Joerg Wunsch wrote:

:) As Theodore A. Roth wrote:
:)
:) > :) What about my recently posted patch that moves _LPM & Co out of
:) > :) <avr/ina90.h>?  Should i commit that?
:) >
:) > I don't see anything wrong with this:
:) >
:) > 
http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/pipermail/avr-libc-dev/2002-October/000360.html
:) >
:) > Feel free to commit it.
:)
:) The only open topic was whether it's OK to have no _LPM() (but only
:) __LPM()) in the default header, i. e. to require users who want the
:) IAR compatibility names to include <avr/ina90.h>.

If the user is already using _LPM(), they are including <avr/ina90.h> so
they should be fine.

We should add a new section to the docs which documents this and all
incompatible changes from the previous stable release (20020203 in this
case, I think).

Ted Roth