Re: [avr-libc-dev] dox status and next release

[Joerg Wunsch]

As Theodore A. Roth wrote:

> :) What about my recently posted patch that moves _LPM & Co out of
> :) <avr/ina90.h>?  Should i commit that?
> 
> I don't see anything wrong with this:
> 
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/pipermail/avr-libc-dev/2002-October/000360.html
> 
> Feel free to commit it.

The only open topic was whether it's OK to have no _LPM() (but only
__LPM()) in the default header, i. e. to require users who want the
IAR compatibility names to include <avr/ina90.h>.

-- 
J"org Wunsch                                           Unix support engineer
address@hidden        http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/