avr-libc-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-libc-dev] Why include <ina90.h> from <avr/pgmspace.h>?


From: Joerg Wunsch
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Why include <ina90.h> from <avr/pgmspace.h>?
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 23:59:35 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

As Theodore A. Roth wrote:

> I'd really like to know definitively what the conventions for using a
> single and a double underscore in the library are. I for one have been
> utterly confused on more than one occasion. Seems to me that user
> application code should not be relying or using anything from the library
> that starts with an underscore. This gives the developers the ability to
> change the "behind the scnes" implementation with out breaking users code
> (assuming the user did the right thing). I'd like to see a note in the
> docs explaining this.

I'll try to dig this up in the C standards draft i've got.

In that case, we need to rename things like __lpm_inline() so they
are no longer official interfaces.
-- 
J"org Wunsch                                           Unix support engineer
address@hidden        http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]