Re: [avr-libc-dev] timer.h

[Chris Baugher]

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, E. Weddington wrote:
> On 30 Sep 2002 at 9:53, Theodore A. Roth wrote:
>
> > I like the sound of this. Give the user a documented example/reference
> > implementation in the dox examples. Explain the pros, cons and gotchas
> > of using it. With this approach, we take a lower priority stance than
> > the core library (interfaces like this might bit rot as new devices
> > come out, but I'd rather have example bit rot than core bit rot), we
> > still add value (they can cut/paste if they want) and we reduce bloat
> > in the core lib (always a good thing).
>
> Sounds good.

This sounds reasonable.  Please ignore my previous comment about macros.

C|