[avr-libc-dev] [RFC] faq update

[Theodore A. Roth]

Joerg,

How's this look?

The only questionable change is this:

 this same register can be re-used later on if the compiler notices
 that the first variable is no longer used inside that function, even
-though the function is still in lexical scope.  When trying to examine
+though the variable is still in lexical scope.  When trying to examine
 the variable in \c avr-gdb, the displayed result will then look
 garbled.

I always thought that the scope of a variable was the function (in this
case at least). Maybe I'm misunstandering the meaning of "lexical scope"
here.

Ted Roth

avr-libc-faq-update.diff
Description: Text document