avr-libc-corelib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Avr-libc-corelib] Still alive?


From: Frédéric Nadeau
Subject: Re: [Avr-libc-corelib] Still alive?
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:14:38 -0400

I'm still working on the idea of having per device driver library.
Unfortunately, I did not have lot of time lately. The projects I'm
working on require multiple AVR devices(from ATtiny to ATmega), we use
http://code.google.com/p/avr-drv/ which currently works well for ADC,
CAN and TimerCounter0. Don't pay mutch attention to usart and spi
module.

Once our projects are finished, which should be around september, I'll
be glad to discuss the API and find means to adapt it to more cases. I
would have like to discussed it more, but seeing the time the SPI API
took, well we had to move forward to meet our deadline.

It would be nice indeed to know if Atmel is planning on having the ASF
ported to AVR devices. But there are few things I don't like in the
ASF AVR32 framework, like the fact that the USART append a '\n' when
you send a '\r'... kinda not cool when sending binary format. At least
we have access to the source code to fix it.

Frédéric Nadeau ing. jr



On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Joe Pardue <address@hidden> wrote:
> Is this group still alive? I intended to start helping out when my work
> cycle got to the point of needing these libraries and I could take the time
> to learn to use the tools (mainly SVN). I'm at that point now and trying to
> figure out how to proceed.
>
>
>
> This query prompted me to look as some other options:
>
> http://www.avrfreaks.net/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=96357&highlight=
>
>
>
> This AVR Software Framework business makes me wonder if the folks at Atmel
> aren't already building something like the avr-libc-corelib in the
> background – they started ASF for the AVR32, then they ported it to the
> Xmega, so how can we be sure they aren’t now working on porting it to the
> ATmega and Attiny? We decided to do our first library on SPI, but the ASF
> has SPI done for Xmega and it wouldn’t be too hard to port that to ATmega.
> I'd hate to spend a lot of time working on items for the ATmega only to have
> the ASF release a bunch of decent functions the obsolete our effort.
>
>
>
> So any opinions on ASF versus avr-libc-corelib?
>
> Joe



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]