[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] LLVM 4.0 AVR backend
|
From: |
Erik Christiansen |
|
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] LLVM 4.0 AVR backend |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Mar 2017 19:30:06 +1100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) |
Reply-To: address@hidden
On 16.03.17 08:54, David Brown wrote:
> It might be a little heretical to ask here, but has anyone tried out the
> experimental AVR backend in the latest llvm/clang release? I have not
> made much use of clang, but it's been good for gcc to have a bit of
> friendly competition. I think it will be interesting to see how
> clang/llvm differs from gcc for the AVR.
No, I haven't tried it. As even gcc backend support moves at a sedate
pace, I'm moved to wonder who works on the llvm avr backend?
Your move to discover what user base it has is a good one, but after a
couple of decades of using gcc on multiple targets, I'm probably rusted
on to the toolchain which has served me so well for so long in so many
battles.
Erik