[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc still broken because of new device specific specs
From: |
Georg-Johann Lay |
Subject: |
[avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc still broken because of new device specific specs and libs |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:56:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 |
avr-gcc is still broken and fails to compile trivial programs:
$ avr-gcc-5.0 -mmcu=atmega8 main.c
/local/gnu/install/gcc-5.0/lib/gcc/avr/5.0.0/../../../../avr/bin/ld: cannot
find dev/atmega8/crt1.o: No such file or directory
/local/gnu/install/gcc-5.0/lib/gcc/avr/5.0.0/../../../../avr/bin/ld: cannot
find dev/atmega8/libdev.a: No such file or directory
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Target: avr
Configured with: ../../gcc.gnu.org/trunk/configure --target=avr
--prefix=/local/gnu/install/gcc-5.0 --disable-shared --disable-nls
--with-dwarf2 --enable-target-optspace=yes --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld
target_alias=avr --enable-languages=c,c++
gcc version 5.0.0 20150216 (experimental) (GCC)
I just updated my sources and built / installed
- GCC configured for avr (trunk)
- Binutils configured for avr (master)
- AVR-Libc (trunk)
This situation persists for several months now, since around october '14 or so.
When will this be fixed?
Or am I missing something fundamentally like new configure options?
More specifically:
1) Where is the (internal) documentation of all of this?
2) What must I do to get a working toolchain?
3) What must I do to get a working build directory, e.g. for running testsuite
against a freshly built and not yet installed compiler?
4) If this stuff is not (completely) hosted in GCC repo, what has been done
(e.g. GCC configury) so that older GCC versions factor out the presumably now
incompatible dependencies? In particular: How is ensured that avr-gcc 4.9,
4.8 etc. will still build and work as expected with such external dependencies?
5) Are these extensions hosted in a different place? I.e. is avr backend no
more supported by the FSF or forked and FSF code base messed up by half-baked
changes? Or is hardware vendor simply half-hearted about state of avr-gcc?
The current situation is that it's almost impossible to contribute to avr-gcc
because it's impossible to run tests against patches.
Applying additional patches or hacks to get it linking is actually no solution
because that will invalidate test results as tests won't run against the
intended patch but against a completely different delta.
If nobody is inclined to complete the device-specs / device-libc then I will
propose to revert these changes in order to get a working avr-gcc 5.0.
Johann
- [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc still broken because of new device specific specs and libs,
Georg-Johann Lay <=