[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] modulo vs. loop (gcc 4.3.x bug)
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] modulo vs. loop (gcc 4.3.x bug) |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:52:39 +0100 (MET) |
Szikra Istvan <address@hidden> wrote:
> -bootloader section cannot have calls to the application section !
That's only your problem though. The compiler can reasonably expect
you to include all its helper functions into the resulting binary.
I agree it's a pessimization here, but it's correct code. The
compiler cannot have any idea about you distinguishing between an
application and a bootloader area.
Rule of thumb: whenever you are tempted to create a separate
..bootloader section, you are usually wrong. The bootloader is simply
a standalone application of its own, so compile/link it that way.
> if I wanted modulo, I would have written %
It's a machine. The optimizer is tuned to catch situations which the
developer didn't write in a machine-friendly (but usually in a
user-friendly) way, and from its point of view, your code probably
just looks like a poor attempt to write down a simple division/modulus
operation. The only fault of the optimizer here is to not recognize
that including the library function will result in larger code.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- [avr-gcc-list] modulo vs. loop (gcc 4.3.x bug), Szikra Istvan, 2010/03/27
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] modulo vs. loop (gcc 4.3.x bug),
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Message not available
- [avr-gcc-list] modulo vs. loop (gcc 4.3.x bug), Szikra Istvan, 2010/03/27
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] modulo vs. loop (gcc 4.3.x bug), Joerg Wunsch, 2010/03/28
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] modulo vs. loop (gcc 4.3.x bug), Szikra Istvan, 2010/03/28
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] modulo vs. loop (gcc 4.3.x bug), Erik Christiansen, 2010/03/28
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] modulo vs. loop (gcc 4.3.x bug), Joerg Wunsch, 2010/03/29
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] modulo vs. loop (gcc 4.3.x bug), Erik Christiansen, 2010/03/29
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] modulo vs. loop (gcc 4.3.x bug), Joerg Wunsch, 2010/03/29