RE: [avr-gcc-list] patches for binutils 2.20

[Weddington, Eric]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dale [mailto:address@hidden 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 4:11 PM
> To: Weddington, Eric
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] patches for binutils 2.20
> 
> Hi Eric,                                   >@2010.02.17_10:35:26_+0200
> 
> > 
> > See attached.
> > 
> > Special thanks to Anitha Boyapati who did the porting effort.
> > 
> > Let us know of any issues.
> > 
> 
> There were a couple of patches that didn't apply cleanly. I see they
> were generated against 2.19, which may account for it.

Did they not apply at all? Or did they apply, but with a fuzz? Which patches?


 
> I've attached a monolithic patch, which includes all patches and does
> apply cleanly to my Debian version of 2.20.

I can't deal with a monolithic patch. There are certain patches, like the 
avr-size patch, that will never be committed upstream and must be separate. 
Other patches, like device support, will be committed upstream. So there are 
reasons why these are separate patches.

Eric