Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: optimizer removes volatile pin access code.why?

[Joerg Wunsch]

As Weddington, Eric wrote:

> And IMHO, I highly doubt that this proposal will be approved. They
> will probably just come back to you and say that there's no need for
> it.

Why not?  Why do you think issuing a warning for something that is
known it cannot work would be rejected?  If the always_inline
attribute is known to only work for a function declared inline, it
should be legitimate to warn the user about a situation where this
prerequisite is not met.

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)