[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Larger than 64K memory sections
From: |
David Kelly |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Larger than 64K memory sections |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:00:41 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 09:55:05AM -0500, David Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 08:21:00PM -0700, Parthasaradhi Nayani wrote:
>
> > Details of application - I have data packets each 32 bytes in size and
> > we have accommodate 2000 of these (predefined).
>
> 32 * 2000 = 6400 bytes.
Arrgh! Decaf!
64,000 bytes. Half of a megabit.
--
David Kelly N4HHE, address@hidden
========================================================================
Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
- [avr-gcc-list] Larger than 64K memory sections, Parthasaradhi Nayani, 2009/08/26
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: Larger than 64K memory sections, David Brown, 2009/08/26
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Larger than 64K memory sections, Jan Waclawek, 2009/08/26
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: Larger than 64K memory sections, David Brown, 2009/08/26
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Larger than 64K memory sections, David Kelly, 2009/08/26
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: Larger than 64K memory sections, David Brown, 2009/08/26
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Larger than 64K memory sections, Parthasaradhi Nayani, 2009/08/26
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Larger than 64K memory sections, Tero Sinervo, 2009/08/27
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Larger than 64K memory sections, David Kelly, 2009/08/27
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Larger than 64K memory sections,
David Kelly <=
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Larger than 64K memory sections, Stu Bell, 2009/08/27
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Larger than 64K memory sections, Parthasaradhi Nayani, 2009/08/27
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Larger than 64K memory sections, Tero Sinervo, 2009/08/27
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: Larger than 64K memory sections, David Brown, 2009/08/27
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Larger than 64K memory sections, Parthasaradhi Nayani, 2009/08/26